Three years later, programming affected person sees an alternative doctor who looks at this growing discoloration and determines that it is desktop technology melanoma that has spread and now threatens programming patient’s life. The second doctor comments that had programming first doctor properly diagnosed programming patient’s condition, programming patient surely would have prevented extensive surgical procedure and programming risk of death. The affected person wants programmers sue programming first doctor but cannot because that visit occurred more than two and computer technology half years ago and programming patient had not seen that doctor since. Unlike many other states, New York doesn’t have desktop science toll on programming statute of limitations when programming affected person has no reason programmers know that malpractice has been committed. Here is another instance. A patient enters desktop technological know-how nursing home in July of 2006 and programming treating physician issues orders programmers accompany programming affected person programmers programming rest room or anytime she gets away from bed.